Lately I've been juggling several projects- I'm still communicating with
Chinese suppliers for the rice husk generation project, and at the same
time evaluating reports on improving fuel efficiency in the Chinese
automotive industry. Both have been great learning opportunities for my
Chinese, and also HUGE tests of my patience and determination. For
example, not only do I have to understand biomass generation technology
but also I must communicate the project needs to the suppliers, make
sure they understand some key aspects of a GEF project, and keep the
project lead updated. It's been difficult since we are not flexible on
the project parameters and we are looking for a turnkey supplier, but
things are moving along.
At the office, it's generally casual and
quiet. Most people work on their own projects and know relatively
little about what's going on for others. However I do appreciate that
the more senior/experienced officers are very approachable and
incorporate me as much as possible. For example, J and M were extremely
helpful when I had questions about my visa, D told me about an EU Call
for Proposals for collaborating environmental projects and the UNEP
emissions gap press release (of which I was completely unaware), and A
invited me to a China in the World meeting and a biotechnology and
biofuels conference next Tuesday. By attending these events, I've been
getting a feel for how the international community works in Beijing and
also the plethora of orgs related to environment, water, energy,
sustainability, etc. And it's not just NGOs or European countries'
development agencies or international development groups; there is a
great representation from Chinese governmental agencies and research
institutes who work in this field as well. I have to say, in a very
cliche way, that it's exciting and inspiring to see so many individuals
and groups working toward a common goal.
So last Thursday, I
attended the UNEP Emissions Gap Beijing Press Release. Yet another
reminder that the improvements we're making in climate change are not
nearly enough to put us on the golden path- the golden 2C path that will
maintain the global temperature increase at 2C. How's it looking right
now? We're several gigatons of carbon emissions away from achieving this
path, and we're headed on a path for ~3.5C increase.
The politics of climate change research, policy, and organizations
was definitely present. At the press release, the 2 Chinese
representatives for the IPCC presented on the emissions gap as well as
climate change, energy, and environment in the Chinese context. The
first expert, who is a professor Tsinghua University, mentioned a
heavily debated "negative emissions" scenario in which around the year
2070 the technologies in carbon capture and storage and the utilization
of renewable energies will be so well developed that more carbon is
being removed from the atmosphere rather than emitted (a simple mass
balance: carbon_IN < carbon_OUT). Currently there's a lot of climate
change policy action- the World Bank also released a report called Turn
Down the Heat, on mitigation efforts and how much more susceptible the developing world is to
natural disasters, famine, and other climate phenomena. You can read more
here.
These reports were all published at the opportune moment, right before
the UNFCCC's Doha meeting.